Outcomes and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute biliary pancreatitis

Background Indication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is challenging. Aims In this retrospective study, we analyzed real-world data to understand the ERCP practice in ABP in Hungarian centers. Methods Clinical data on ABP patients (2013–20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kollaborációs szervezet: Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group
Szabó-Halász Adrienn
Pécsi Dániel
Borbásné Farkas Kornélia
Izbéki Ferenc
Gajdán László
Fejes Roland
Hamvas József
Takács Tamás
Szepes Zoltán
Czakó László
Vincze Áron
Gódi Szilárd
Szentesi Andrea Ildikó
Párniczky Andrea
Illés Dóra
Kui Balázs
Varjú Péter
Márta Katalin
Varga Márta
Novák János
Szepes Attila
Bod Barnabás
Ihász Miklós
Hegyi Péter
Hritz István
Erőss Bálint Mihály
Format: Article
Published: 2019
Series:DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE 51 No. 9
doi:10.1016/j.dld.2019.03.018

mtmt:30648945
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/22006
Description
Summary:Background Indication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is challenging. Aims In this retrospective study, we analyzed real-world data to understand the ERCP practice in ABP in Hungarian centers. Methods Clinical data on ABP patients (2013–2015) were extracted from our large multicentric database. Outcomes, quality indicators and the role of early timing of ERCP (<24 h from admission) were analyzed. Results There were 356 patients with ABP. ERCP was performed in 267 (75%). Performance indicators of ERCP proved to be suboptimal with a biliary cannulation rate of 84%. Successful vs unsuccessful cannulation of naïve papilla resulted in lower rates of local [22.9% vs 40.9%, (P = 0.012)] and systemic [4.9% vs 13.6%, (P = 0.042)] complications. Successful vs unsuccessful clearance resulted in lower rates of local complications [22.5% vs 40.8%, (P = 0.008)]. Successful cannulation and drainage correlated with less severe course of ABP [3.6% vs 15.9%, (P = 0.001) and 4.1% vs 12.2%, (P = 0.033)] respectively. A tendency of an increased rate of local complications was observed if ERCP was performed later [<24 h: 21.1% (35/166); between 24–48 h: 23.4% (11/47); >48h: 37.2% (16/43) (P = 0.088)]. Conclusion Optimization of ERCP indication in ABP patients is critical as suboptimal ERCP practices in ABP without definitive stone detection are associated with poorer clinical outcomes.
Physical Description:1281-1286
ISSN:1590-8658