An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has rapidly emerged as a novel approach for rectal cancer surgery. Safety profiles are still emerging and more comparative data is urgently needed. This study aimed to compare indications and short-term outcomes of TaTME, open, laparoscopic, and robotic TM...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group
Bhangu Aneel
Minaya-Bravo Ana María
Gallo Gaetano
Lázár György ifj
Ábrahám Szabolcs
Paszt Attila
Simonka Zsolt
Tóth Illés János
Zaránd Attila
Baranyai Zsolt
Ferreira Gábor
Harsányi László
Ónody Péter Zoltán
Bánky Balázs
Bursics Attila
Papp Géza
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2018
Sorozat:COLORECTAL DISEASE 20 No. Suppl. 6.
doi:10.1111/codi.14376

mtmt:30379866
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/18761
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has rapidly emerged as a novel approach for rectal cancer surgery. Safety profiles are still emerging and more comparative data is urgently needed. This study aimed to compare indications and short-term outcomes of TaTME, open, laparoscopic, and robotic TME internationally.A pre-planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 audit was performed. Patients undergoing elective total mesorectal excision (TME) for malignancy between 1 January 2017 and 15 March 2017 by any operative approach were included. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak.Of 2579 included patients, 76.2% (1966/2579) underwent TME with restorative anastomosis of which 19.9% (312/1966) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) which included a transanal component (TaTME). Overall, 9.0% (175/1951, 15 missing outcome data) of patients suffered an anastomotic leak. On univariate analysis both laparoscopic TaTME (OR 1.61, 1.02-2.48, P = 0.04) and robotic TaTME (OR 3.05, 1.10-7.34, P = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak than non-transanal laparoscopic TME. However this association was lost in the mixed-effects model controlling for patient and disease factors (OR 1.23, 0.77-1.97, P = 0.39 and OR 2.11, 0.79-5.62, P = 0.14 respectively), whilst low rectal anastomosis (OR 2.72, 1.55-4.77, P < 0.001) and male gender (OR 2.29, 1.52-3.44, P < 0.001) remained strongly associated. The overall positive circumferential margin resection rate was 4.0%, which varied between operative approaches: laparoscopic 3.2%, transanal 3.8%, open 4.7%, robotic 1%.This contemporaneous international snapshot shows that uptake of the TaTME approach is widespread and is associated with surgically and pathologically acceptable results.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:33-46
ISSN:1462-8910