Pressure-regulated volume control vs. volume control ventilation in healthy and injured rabbit lung An experimental study. /

BACKGROUND: It is not well understood how different ventilation modes affect the regional distribution of ventilation, particularly within the injured lung. OBJECTIVES: We compared respiratory mechanics, lung aeration and regional specific ventilation ((Equation is included in full-text article.))...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Porra Liisa
Bayat Sam
Malaspinas Iliona
Albu Gergely
Doras Camille
Broche Ludovic
Strengell Satu
Peták Ferenc
Habre Walid
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2016
Sorozat:EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY 33 No. 10
doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000485

mtmt:3130289
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/11025
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:BACKGROUND: It is not well understood how different ventilation modes affect the regional distribution of ventilation, particularly within the injured lung. OBJECTIVES: We compared respiratory mechanics, lung aeration and regional specific ventilation ((Equation is included in full-text article.)) distributions in healthy and surfactant-depleted rabbits ventilated with pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode with a decelerating inspiratory flow or with volume control (VC) mode. DESIGN: Randomised experimental study. ANIMALS AND INTERVENTIONS: New Zealand white rabbits (n = 8) were anaesthetised, paralysed and mechanically ventilated either with VC or PRVC mode (tidal volume: 7 ml kg; rate: 40 min; positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP): 3 cmH2O), at baseline and after lung injury induced by lung lavage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Airway resistance (Raw), respiratory tissue damping (G) and elastance (H) were measured by low-frequency forced oscillations. Synchrotron radiation computed tomography during stable xenon wash-in was used to measure regional lung aeration and specific ventilation and the relative fraction of nonaerated, trapped, normally, poorly and hyperinflated lung regions. RESULTS: Lung lavage significantly elevated peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) (P < 0.001). PIP was lower on PRVC compared with VC mode (-12.7 +/- 1.7%, P < 0.001). No significant differences in respiratory mechanics, regional ventilation distribution, strain or blood oxygenation could be detected between the two ventilation modes. CONCLUSION: A decelerating flow pattern (PRVC) resulted in equivalent regional ventilation distribution, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, in both normal and mechanically heterogeneous lungs with, however, a significantly lower peak pressure. Our data suggest that the lower PIP on PRVC ventilation was because of the decelerating flow pattern rather than the ventilation distribution.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:767-775
ISSN:0265-0215