Lovakról és vörösökről - egy különös kommunistaperes büntetőeljárás
Many low-ranking officials of the 1919 Hungarian Soviet Republic stood trial after the fall of the short-lived Bolshevik experiment. They could have been indicted on a lot of possible charges. Whenever (and that was the case quite often) there was no strict „political crime” label for something that...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Könyv része |
| Megjelent: |
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Móra Ferenc Szakkollégiuma
Szeged
2024
|
| Sorozat: | Móra Akadémia
13 Móra Akadémia : szakkollégiumi tanulmánykötet 13. 13 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Büntetőper - Magyarország - 1919, Magyarország története - 1919 |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/85215 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | Many low-ranking officials of the 1919 Hungarian Soviet Republic stood trial after the fall of the short-lived Bolshevik experiment. They could have been indicted on a lot of possible charges. Whenever (and that was the case quite often) there was no strict „political crime” label for something that counter-revolutionary prosecution deemed a crime, common law offences were cited in indictments. The Soviet, as a whole, was declared illegitimate; therefore, by abiding its laws as a communard official, one could actually commit a crime under the 1878 criminal code, the „Code Csemegi” of Hungary. One such typical offence was extortion. Since the requisition of consumer goods and weapons were commonplace in the scarcity economy of the Soviet, many people were charged with extortion felonies and misdemeanours. János Gergely and his accomplices were no exception. These officials of Kispest town took part in requisitioning horses for the Red Army of Hungary, for which they were charged with ten counts of felony. They had no reason to hope for an acquittal, since the process had many witnesses, but the court had ruled that since the horses were used for the purpose of national defence, the actions of Gergely and the co-defendants were, if not justified, understandable. In this paper I am giving a brief necessary overview of the communist processes, since it is a short-lived and not very well-known institution of Hungarian law history. Afterwards I give a detailed analysis of the court verdict, with the aim of slicing the Gordian knot – how could an (as the Horthy era legal fiction went) illegitimate state establish a local horse requisitioning committee that was deemed legitimate? What is behind this glaring contradiction? How was it explained by the judges who have decided to acquit the defendants? Could this possibly point to any larger pattern in the communist processes? |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 177-191 |
| ISSN: | 2064-809X |