A progresszív társadalomföldrajz szemlélete
Social geography is becoming more and more interesting and unusual field of science. It is a strange contradiction though that the achievement of social geography grew in the 20`hcentury and it usually had new approaches creating stir as well as its scientific capability of creating value out of the...
Elmentve itt :
Szerző: | |
---|---|
Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
Megjelent: |
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos bizottsága
Szeged
2010
|
Sorozat: | Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : acta juridica et politica
73 No. 1-64 |
Kulcsszavak: | Társadalomföldrajz |
Tárgyszavak: | |
Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/7463 |
Tartalmi kivonat: | Social geography is becoming more and more interesting and unusual field of science. It is a strange contradiction though that the achievement of social geography grew in the 20`hcentury and it usually had new approaches creating stir as well as its scientific capability of creating value out of the science intensified, yet a specific but not in all aspects advantageous picture had been formed of our field of science by the end of the 20thcentury. Moreover, it can be read in some of the evaluations that it was the social geography that put itself into such position by not being able to build into the system of social recognition. But these opinions undoubtedly have significance as they express some kind of difference in the relation between the interested layers of the society and the geography and social geography, although it differs from country to country. At the same time it is also surprising because the scientific achievement of social geography, the importance and the degree of the usability of its results in practice are still not decreasing. Amongst the specific circumstances and `disturbance of growth', the development of the generally accepted definition of social geography must be more difficult as the heritage of old ideas in geography is still exaggeratedly present (often in `national colours'), in the meantime the spread and application (communication, marketing) of the present, new, and general approaches are still less extent as it would be needed. Although regional, linguistic and infrastructural circumstances also play roles in it. The geographic society dealing with social geography is divided regarding its conception and research concepts. But a progressively thinking research community exists with growing numbers which engaged itself in approaching the new questions of the 21stcentury with the most diverse new ideas and concepts. The `professional harmony' of this group and the renewed geographical consciousness raise big hopes. There are more views concerning the main `challenges' for social geography. In my point of view, it is realistic to be of the standpoint that at the beginning of the 21' century, the new mind of social geography can be based on the results of the researches of those complex systems or the capability of research of the social geography, that range over the whole world and shape the fate of the whole world. Social geography can draw the new professional surplus from the material of knowledge of the scientific fields related to this by which it can build new systems of relations of the related branch of knowledge. Of course, it should not be absolutised either. But it might be worth applying it in a sense that it helps to widen the circumstances of the geographical world view of the present and the near future thus making the geography work more effectively. |
---|---|
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 537-545 |
ISSN: | 0324-6523 |