Bővülhetett-e a hunhagyomány a 13. századi Magyarországon?
While analyzing the Hungarian-Polish Chronicle, I came to the conclusion that the text, written before 1266, could reflect the evolution of the Hungarian narrative tradition in the first half of the 13th century. The stoiy of king Attila, told in a fabulous way in the first chapters of the source,...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Testületi szerző: | |
| Dokumentumtípus: | Könyv része |
| Megjelent: |
2015
|
| Sorozat: | Középkortörténeti tanulmányok
8 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Magyarország története - 13. sz. |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/65377 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | While analyzing the Hungarian-Polish Chronicle, I came to the conclusion that the text, written before 1266, could reflect the evolution of the Hungarian narrative tradition in the first half of the 13th century. The stoiy of king Attila, told in a fabulous way in the first chapters of the source, could have already been present in some form or another in the Hungarian gesta by the end of the reign of Andrew П (1205-1235). This hypothesis seems to be supported by the assertions of László Veszprémy who supposed an enrichment of the Hun-Hungarian tradition between the account of the anonymous notary of king Béla III (с. 1210) and the detailed Hun Chronicle by Simon of Kéza (с. 1282-1285). In his article which was devoted to this question, Veszprémy cited an unpublished study by Zoltán Tóth, considering the História Salonitana by Thomas of Split, the Sermons by Oswald of Lasko, the Knauz Chronicle and the Ungarische Chronik by Carinthian chronicler Jakob Unrest as proofs of the evolving Attila tradition. The present paper aims to discuss whether the 13 -century text of Thomas, archdeacon of Split and the three late medieval sources included in Tóth's thesis about a progressively enriching Hun tradition, could give any information about the Hungarian historical tradition before the Gesta Hungarorum by Simon of Kéza. The examination of the sources based on the results of recent historiography has indicated that the arguments of Tóth cannot prove any evolution of the Attila tradition in the 134 -century Hungary. Despite its fabulous elements, the Hungarian-Polish Chronicle could reflect the Hungarian tradition of the first half of the 13th century more than the account by Thomas of Split or our late medieval chronicles. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 277-297 |
| ISBN: | 978-963-315-242-3 |