Az -ék többesjel! /
The author does not agree with the common opinion that the ending -ék (Pistá-ék, tanító-ék) should be considered a suffix for derivation. She endeavours to prove that "-ék" word forms are not "collective nouns" but simply nouns in the plural. The -ék ending is the third suffix fo...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
1995
|
| Sorozat: | Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : sectio ethnographica et linguistica = néprajz és nyelvtudomány = étnografiâ i azykoznanie = Volkskunde und Sprachwissenschaft
36 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Magyar nyelv |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/3777 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | The author does not agree with the common opinion that the ending -ék (Pistá-ék, tanító-ék) should be considered a suffix for derivation. She endeavours to prove that "-ék" word forms are not "collective nouns" but simply nouns in the plural. The -ék ending is the third suffix for the plural in the Hungarian language. The "absolute plural" -k and the "possessive related" -/ are both "homogeneous," expressing multiplication of the denotate (tanító + k = tanító + tanító f+ tanító...]; tanító + i = tanítója + tanítója [+ tanítója...]), while -ék expresses a "heterogeneous" additive plurality, denoting an identified person and his/her family/friends/company: thus tanító + -ék = a tanító + a társ a fi). |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 295-308 |
| ISSN: | 0586-3716 |