A mai uráli nyelvészetről
The present paper deals with current problems of Uralic linguistics in Hungary. Some aspects of recent investigations in this domain are disapproved of, e. g.: (1) taking too little interest in up-to-date theories of language; (2) predominance of diachronic and comparative methods in linguistic rese...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kara
Szeged
1965
|
| Sorozat: | Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : sectio ethnographica et linguistica = néprajz és nyelvtudomány = étnografiâ i azykoznanie = Volkskunde und Sprachwissenschaft
9 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Uráli nyelvek, Nyelvészet - uráli |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/3458 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | The present paper deals with current problems of Uralic linguistics in Hungary. Some aspects of recent investigations in this domain are disapproved of, e. g.: (1) taking too little interest in up-to-date theories of language; (2) predominance of diachronic and comparative methods in linguistic research; (3) hypertrophy of etymological comments and articles (NB. the author doesn't set a low value on etymology on the whole, but a great part of such topics seems to be, to a great extent, of secondary importance; (4) prevalence of mass-production and routine-work (the former appears often in bi- or multilingual publishing of the very same paper, too). Uralic lingustics in Hungary may overcome these difficulties by widening its theoretical background. By applying current trends in structural linguistics, a greater variety of principles, methods and themes could be obtained in this field: This implies, however, that one must give up the old-fashioned view, according to which the principal task of Uralistics is to develop only an extensive program in „pure" comparative linguistics. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 15-21 |
| ISSN: | 0586-3716 |