Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR) a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study /
Background Bortezomib with dexamethasone is a standard treatment option for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib with dexamethasone has shown promising activity in patients in this disease setting. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerzők: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2016
|
| Sorozat: | LANCET ONCOLOGY
17 No. 1 |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| doi: | 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7 |
| mtmt: | 3012971 |
| Online Access: | http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/24148 |
| LEADER | 04402nab a2200409 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | publ24148 | ||
| 005 | 20220420085048.0 | ||
| 008 | 220420s2016 hu o 0|| Angol d | ||
| 022 | |a 1470-2045 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 3012971 |2 mtmt | |
| 040 | |a SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium |b hun | ||
| 041 | |a Angol | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dimopoulos Meletios A. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR) |h [elektronikus dokumentum] : |b a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study / |c Dimopoulos Meletios A. |
| 260 | |c 2016 | ||
| 300 | |a 27-38 | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a LANCET ONCOLOGY |v 17 No. 1 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Background Bortezomib with dexamethasone is a standard treatment option for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib with dexamethasone has shown promising activity in patients in this disease setting. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods In this randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one to three previous treatments were randomly assigned (1: 1) using a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four) to receive carfilzomib with dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib with dexamethasone (bortezomib group). Randomisation was stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, previous lines of treatment, International Staging System stage, and planned route of bortezomib administration if randomly assigned to bortezomib with dexamethasone. Patients received treatment until progression with carfilzomib (20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m(2) thereafter; 30 min intravenous infusion) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) or bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2); intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. The study is ongoing but not enrolling participants; results for the interim analysis of the primary endpoint are presented. Findings Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 929 patients were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group; 465 to the bortezomib group). Median follow-up was 11.9 months (IQR 9.3-16.1) in the carfilzomib group and 11.1 months (8.2-14.3) in the bortezomib group. Median progression-free survival was 18.7 months (95% CI 15.6-not estimable) in the carfilzomib group versus 9.4 months (8.4-10.4) in the bortezomib group at a preplanned interim analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53 [95% CI 0.44-0.65]; p<0.0001). On-study death due to adverse events occurred in 18 (4%) of 464 patients in the carfilzomib group and in 16 (3%) of 465 patients in the bortezomib group. Serious adverse events were reported in 224 (48%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group and in 162 (36%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group. The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events were anaemia (67 [14%] of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group vs 45 [10%] of 456 patients in the bortezomib group), hypertension (41 [9%] vs 12 [3%]), thrombocytopenia (39 [8%] vs 43 [9%]), and pneumonia (32 [7%] vs 36 [8%]). Interpretation For patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, carfilzomib with dexamethasone could be considered in cases in which bortezomib with dexamethasone is a potential treatment option. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Klinikai orvostan | |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Moreau Philippe |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Palumbo Antonio |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Joshua Douglas |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Pour Ludek |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Hájek Roman |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Facon Thierry |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Ludwig Heinz |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 1 | |a Masszi Tamás |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Kollaborációs szervezet: ENDEAVOR investigators |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Horváth Noémi |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Egyed Miklós |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Masszi Tamás |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Szomor Árpád |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Borbényi Zita |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Illés Árpád |e aut |
| 700 | 0 | 2 | |a Kovácsovics Tibor |e aut |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/24148/1/Dimopoulos.pdf |z Dokumentum-elérés |