<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>02005nab a2200241 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">publ12271</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200319125510.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">171114s2015    hu      o     0||   zxx d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">2212-4403</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">10.1016/j.oooo.2014.12.009</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">2848446</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">mtmt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">hun</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">zxx</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Plachtovics Márk</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The effect of calibration and detector temperature on the reconstructed cone beam computed tomography image quality</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[elektronikus dokumentum] :</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">a study for the workflow of the iCAT Classic equipment /</subfield>
   <subfield code="c"> Plachtovics Márk</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Elsevier</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">473-480</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY</subfield>
   <subfield code="v">119 No. 4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">OBJECTIVE: The image quality of the reconstructed dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition is strongly dependent on the characteristics of the applied detector. Some flat panel detector (FPD) types require a warming-up period (WUP) to achieve a steady-state temperature; and some of them, those that  have a cesium iodide detector, may require a calibration process (CP) after each  WUP. STUDY DESIGN: Quality-assurance phantom was used for the evaluation of image quality, including spatial accuracy and density response with and without WUP and CP using iCAT Classic equipment. RESULTS: The correlation between the measured gray values and the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) values deviated slightly from linearity (defined by the 45-degree line). There was no detectable  difference in the spatial accuracy of the four different scanning modes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the WUP is important to reach the required steady-state temperature, the CP has a greater effect on the image quality.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">Góczán János</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">Nagy Katalin</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/12271/1/2848446.pdf</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Dokumentum-elérés </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/12271/7/_2848446.pdf</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Dokumentum-elérés </subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
