A kulturális örökségek ellen elkövetett bűncselekmények felelősségi kérdései
The protection of cultural heritage and cultural property is a priority since ancient times. Uncountable dangerous events of our history jeopardized the cultural heritage during different eras. After the destruction and disasters of World War II, nations realized that urgent and efficient steps must...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Testületi szerző: | |
| Dokumentumtípus: | Könyv része |
| Megjelent: |
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Móra Ferenc Szakkollégiuma
Szeged
2023
|
| Sorozat: | Móra Akadémia
12 Móra Akadémia : szakkollégiumi tanulmánykötet 12. 12 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Kulturális örökség védelme - jogi szabályozás |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/78961 |
| LEADER | 02575naa a2200253 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | acta78961 | ||
| 005 | 20230626062735.0 | ||
| 008 | 230626s2023 hu o 0|| hun d | ||
| 022 | |a 2064-809X | ||
| 040 | |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium |b hun | ||
| 041 | |a hun | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gál Rita Ilona | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A kulturális örökségek ellen elkövetett bűncselekmények felelősségi kérdései |h [elektronikus dokumentum] / |c Gál Rita Ilona |
| 260 | |a Szegedi Tudományegyetem Móra Ferenc Szakkollégiuma |b Szeged |c 2023 | ||
| 300 | |a 59-72 | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Móra Akadémia |v 12 | |
| 490 | 0 | |a Móra Akadémia : szakkollégiumi tanulmánykötet 12. |v 12 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a The protection of cultural heritage and cultural property is a priority since ancient times. Uncountable dangerous events of our history jeopardized the cultural heritage during different eras. After the destruction and disasters of World War II, nations realized that urgent and efficient steps must to taken. The international law has developed a lot since the middle of the 20th century. During the last seven decades, numerous international conventions has been accepted. Their role in determining and categorizing several kinds of cultural heritage and properties is indisputable. Although these steps forward were excellent, the development of jurisdiction for crimes against cultural heritage and property, and the ability to determine and prove personal responsibility for such violations and offences, became possible only after the devastating armed conflicts happened in the near past. Statutes of the ICTY and the ICC mean the essential legal base of jurisdiction for crimes against cultural heritage. These violations are belong to war crimes.The results of the case of Al-Mahdi and the cases of the ICTY point out the factors that make perpetrators countable for crimes against cultural heritage. The legal instruments of international law are efficient for state individual criminal responsibility, and the Statute of the ICC is valid in cases both of international armed conflicts and armed conflicts not of an international character. However, since the jurisdiction of the ICC is not universal, perpetrators might avoid inculpation. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Társadalomtudományok | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jogtudomány | |
| 695 | |a Kulturális örökség védelme - jogi szabályozás | ||
| 710 | |a Móra Kárpát-medencei Interdiszciplináris Szakkollégiumi Konferencia (6.) (2022) (Szeged) | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/78961/1/moraakademia_012_059-072.pdf |z Dokumentum-elérés |