The UN-constitutional constitution of the Republic of Kosovo the principle of the double "Super"majority /

The Constitution of Kosovo has entered into power in June 2008, 5 months after the Declaration of the Independence of Kosovo (February 2008). The declaration of independence came after years of negotiations conducted between the political leaders of both Kosovo and Serbia, where no common ground for...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Pustina Lorik
Testületi szerző: Jog határok nélkül (2017) (Szeged)
Dokumentumtípus: Könyv része
Megjelent: 2018
Sorozat:Szegedi Jogász Doktorandusz Konferenciák 8
Jog határok nélkül 8
Kulcsszavak:Alkotmány - Koszovó
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/74997
LEADER 02994naa a2200265 i 4500
001 acta74997
005 20231205112507.0
008 220325s2018 hu o 1|| hun d
020 |a 978-963-306-640-9 
022 |a 2063-3807 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Pustina Lorik 
245 1 4 |a The UN-constitutional constitution of the Republic of Kosovo   |h [elektronikus dokumentum] :  |b the principle of the double "Super"majority /  |c  Pustina Lorik 
260 |c 2018 
300 |a 287-305 
490 0 |a Szegedi Jogász Doktorandusz Konferenciák  |v 8 
490 0 |a Jog határok nélkül  |v 8 
520 3 |a The Constitution of Kosovo has entered into power in June 2008, 5 months after the Declaration of the Independence of Kosovo (February 2008). The declaration of independence came after years of negotiations conducted between the political leaders of both Kosovo and Serbia, where no common ground for a mutually accepted result was reached. It was at that time the Special Envoy of the United Nations, President Marti Ahtisaari who proposed the Comprehensive Status Proposal settlement both to Serbia and Kosovo, giving Kosovo a time-limited “supervised independence” with enhanced protection of the minorities, emphasis on the Serbian minorities living in Kosovo. One of the provisions to be critically argued in the paper will be the one of the reserved, i.e. guaranteed spots for the minorities in the Kosovo parliament, which is 20 out of 120. While the other one, arguably representing a provision that makes Kosovo legislative agenda dysfunctional in terms of constitutional amendments and passing or amending laws of a crucial importance, is the requirement of 2/3 majority of the Parliament and in addition the 2/3 of the minority reserved seats. In the legislative practice since the declaration of independence we have evidenced many cases where the Serbian minority representatives, directed by Belgrade policy, have halted the adoption of many important laws, as well as the amendment of certain Constitutional provisions, imposing different conditions that in many cases have infringed different laws and other legislative documents adopted by the Parliament. The paper will prove that such provisions in the original text of the Constitution, represent by all means a precedent to the constitutional norms, creating a gap between the policy makers and the legislative bodies, as well as compare those provisions to the Constitutions in other countries such as Macedonia, Croatia and Montenegro by analyzing as well as providing solution to possible Constitutional amendments in order to drift from the dysfunctional legislative process. 
650 4 |a Társadalomtudományok 
650 4 |a Jogtudomány 
695 |a Alkotmány - Koszovó 
710 |a Jog határok nélkül (2017) (Szeged) 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/74997/1/szegedi_jogasz_doktorandusz_konf_008_287-305.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés