Montenegró és a geopolitika két nagyprojekt tükrében /

Montenegro declared its independence again on June 3, 2006. Its area is relatively small (a bit larger than the combined area of Csongrád and Bács-Kiskun counties in Hungary) as well as its population of 660.000. Due to the also small size of its economy, a handful of companies can gain significance...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Bózsó Péter Tamás
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: Egyesület Közép-Európa Kutatására Szeged 2020
Sorozat:Köztes-Európa : társadalomtudományi folyóirat 12 No. 1
Kulcsszavak:Montenegró - geopolitika
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/71810
LEADER 02894nab a2200229 i 4500
001 acta71810
005 20230320152212.0
008 210208s2020 hu o 0|| hun d
022 |a 2064-437X 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a hun 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Bózsó Péter Tamás 
245 1 0 |a Montenegró és a geopolitika   |h [elektronikus dokumentum] :  |b két nagyprojekt tükrében /  |c  Bózsó Péter Tamás 
260 |a Egyesület Közép-Európa Kutatására  |b Szeged  |c 2020 
300 |a 5-21 
490 0 |a Köztes-Európa : társadalomtudományi folyóirat  |v 12 No. 1 
520 3 |a Montenegro declared its independence again on June 3, 2006. Its area is relatively small (a bit larger than the combined area of Csongrád and Bács-Kiskun counties in Hungary) as well as its population of 660.000. Due to the also small size of its economy, a handful of companies can gain significance (like a power plant and an aluminium factory). Relative underdevelopment also means that agriculture and tourism are significant in its economy. The modernisation of the country needs capital that mostly comes from abroad, so foreign direct investments play a significant role, also including Magyar Telekom and OTP Bank from Hungary. The geopolitical context is presented here by the example of two large infrastructure projects. First, the history of the construction of the underwater electric cable connecting the country to Italy is examined, which also reflects the links of Montenegro to the EU. The launching of the Italian project was partially financed by the EU and Germany. As an adverse effect, electricity exports to a new market and upgraded interconnection grids to neighbouring countries may preserve the existence of heavily polluting fossil fuel power stations of the West Balkan region. Whether stricter environmental standards are followed is heavily depends on the EU stand in the accession processes as well as the strengths of local green movements. The second large project which is presented is the construction of the motorway connecting the touristic seaside to Serbia that is financed and carried out by China, due to the lack of other investing interests. Return on the project seems to be not guaranteed and many believe that the country takes up an excessive risk. The €1.3 billion loan that was needed for the construction have increased the debt to GDP ratio of Montenegro from 63% in 2012 to present 80%. In case of default, China would also seize land pieces in the country. These projects clearly signal the present changes in influence due to the geopolitical power shit of great and local powers. 
650 4 |a Társadalomtudományok 
650 4 |a Társadalom- és gazdaságföldrajz 
695 |a Montenegró - geopolitika 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/71810/1/koztes_europa_2020_001_005-021.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés