A kőszénbányászati jog adományozásának egyes kérdései

This study is about the history of the Hungarian mining law after 1854. In the first part, the author introduces the theoretical features of the mining law which pertained to the administrative law but also had a close connection to private law. The basis of the examined era (1920–1930) was the Aust...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerző: Szivós Kristóf
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2018
Sorozat:Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : forum : publicationes discipulorum iurisprudentiae 1
Kulcsszavak:Bányajog
Tárgyszavak:
Online Access:http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/70855
LEADER 02300nab a2200217 i 4500
001 acta70855
005 20210118150252.0
008 201207s2018 hu o 0|| zxx d
022 |a 2560-2802 
040 |a SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a zxx 
100 1 |a Szivós Kristóf 
245 1 2 |a A kőszénbányászati jog adományozásának egyes kérdései  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] /  |c  Szivós Kristóf 
260 |c 2018 
300 |a 627-658 
490 0 |a Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : forum : publicationes discipulorum iurisprudentiae  |v 1 
520 3 |a This study is about the history of the Hungarian mining law after 1854. In the first part, the author introduces the theoretical features of the mining law which pertained to the administrative law but also had a close connection to private law. The basis of the examined era (1920–1930) was the Austrian General Mining Act of 1854. The main principle of the mining law was ‘the freedom of mining’ (Bergbaufreiheit) which meant that everyone who was able to acquire the property of a land could acquire the right of mining. The Mining Act had to be applied to those minerals which were reserved meaning that the specific mineral did not belong to the real estate. Coal was the most problematic mineral of this era since it belonged to the real estate but could only be mined under the regulation of the Mining Act. The author points out that the right of coal mining was acquired with donation. In this procedure, the mining authority examined whether the libellant fulfilled the conditions of donation or not. The author identifies seven conditions through archive sources. If they were satisfied, the mining authority did not have discretion – it had to donate the right. The condition specifically referring to coal mining was the approval of the landowner. In a separate chapter, the author examines the different methods of how this approval could be granted. He emphasises the importance of lease contracts which were the most common type of contracts, and analyses the congruencies between mining law and private law. 
650 4 |a Társadalomtudományok 
650 4 |a Jogtudomány 
695 |a Bányajog 
856 4 0 |u http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/70855/1/forum_discipulorum_2018_627-658.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés