<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>02614nab a2200229 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">acta2829</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260202150534.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">161015s1996    hu      o     000   hun d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">0324-6965</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">SZTE Egyetemi Kiadványok Repozitórium</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">hun</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">hun</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Tóth Sándor László</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A Porta és a tizenöt éves háború kitörése</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[elektronikus dokumentum] /</subfield>
   <subfield code="c"> Tóth Sándor László</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">University of Szeged, Magyar Medievisztikai Kutatócsoport</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Szeged</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">1996</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">101-112</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Acta Universitatis Szegediensis : acta historica</subfield>
   <subfield code="v">103</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The author of the study analyses the causes, which led to the outbreak of the so-called „fifteen years war&quot; or „long war&quot; (1593-1606). The „price revolution&quot; contributed to the internal crise of the Ottoman Empire, which was reflected in the rebellions of the paid troops of the Sultanic household (1589, 1593) and in factional struggles, frequent changes of government. As the Persian war (1578-1590) drew to its end, the tension increased between the Habsburg and the Ottoman Empire. Both sides interpreted differently the peace treaty of Edirne (1568), which was renewed three times. The Ottomans emphasized the the punctual dispatch of the annual tribute for the Porte, while the Habsburg court stressed, that in return for the „honorary present&quot; the Ottomans should not violate the treaty by raids into Habsburg-territory. In spite of the incident of Szikszó (1588) and the ensuing conflict the peace treaty was renewed in 1590. A more serious tension followed, when Hasan Pasha of Bosnia raided Croatia and occupied forts in 1591-92. The open violation of the treaty resulted, that Emperor Rudolph stopped sending the tribute. The new grand vezir Sinan Pasha has been considered by scholars to be the leader of the „war party&quot;. In the opinion of the author of the study Sinan did not want war in the beginning, just demanded the dispatch of two years' tribute and the release of the beyis. The defeat of the Pasha of Bosnia at Sziszek (Sisak) at June 22 1593 had serious effect. Sultan Murad III summoned a council (July 4), in which Sinan Pasha advised to declare war, while Ferhad Pasha and Zekeriyye mufti argued against it. Sultan Murad decided for war and appointed Sinan to commander-in-chief.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Bölcsészettudományok</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Történettudomány és régészet</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="695" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Oszmán Birodalom története - 16. sz., Magyarország története - 16. sz.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/2829/1/historica_103_101-112.pdf</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Dokumentum-elérés </subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
